Jump to content
IGNORED

Politička korektnost


čekmeže

Recommended Posts

i radi posao. nekad preterano verbalno ulepshavanje stvarnosti ne sluzi nichemu, narochito ako se  sadrzaj stvarnosti ne menja. a to je vrlo chesto.

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Recimo da ova dva slučaja mogu ovde ali svakako prevazilaze pitanje političke korektnosti. 

 

Slučaj I iz Australije - prezbiterijanska crkva odbila je da venča par koji zagovara glasanje na referendumu u korist marriage equality.  

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/church-cancels-wedding-because-bride-and-groom-supported-gay-marriage-on-facebook-20170913-gygcyp.html

Ukratko,

 

A Victorian church refused to marry a young couple and cancelled their wedding plans because the bride-to-be expressed support for same-sex marriage on Facebook.

 

In a letter to the bride, provided to Fairfax Media, Mr North said the views expressed in the Facebook post had "practical consequences" for the wedding. "After the pre-marital counselling that you attended and the sermons delivered at Ebenezer on this subject, you must surely appreciate that your commitment to same-sex marriage opposes the teaching of Christ Jesus and the scriptural position practiced by the Presbyterian Church of Australia and by me,"

 

 

Slučaj II - Otkaz zbog komentara "u redu je glasati ne na referendumu"

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/sep/20/company-that-fired-woman-for-saying-its-ok-to-vote-no-may-have-broken-law

 

Ukratko, vlasnica firme je ovakav status okarakterisala kao hate speech.

 

"It is not okay to vote no. Iti is not okay to be homophobic". ... “As a business that works with children of all kinds, we have a responsibility to working with vulnerable people and having someone who is out [and] proud about their beliefs (of which are statistically proven to have horrible effects on young members of the gay community) is a risk for the wellbeing of the children we work with.”

 

 

Ajd da zauzmem početni stav, - čini mi se da su slučajevi povezani i da pokazuju tendenciju da se polje slobode govora sužava u ime progresivnih ideja. U prvom slučaju par koji pripada toj verskoj zajednici je iskazao stav koji je verska zajednica protumačila kao suprotan vrednostima zajednice. Meni se čini da oni (dvoje vernika i verska zajednica) treba ovo pitanje da reše samostalno, pa makar se razdružili (ne budući supružnici  :D, nego njih dvoje sa crkvom). A ceo narativ je da crkva ne bi smela ovakav stav da zauzme jer je diskriminatoran. Nije. Pripadnost verskoj zajednici i venčanje u crkvi nije obavezno, naprotiv. 

 

Drugi slučaj - u tekstu na Guardianu se (sigurno niste iznenađeni) naglašava ironija da ljude sa desničarskim pogledima štiti antidiskriminaciono zakonodavstvo. Međutim, postoji i ironija na drugoj strani i bilo bi mi zanimljivo da diskutujemo o napetosti između Labour Left i Progressive Left. Jer, ovde imamo slučaj da jedna progresivno orijentisana šefica otpušta radnicu zbog stavova koje iznosi na FB i koristi klasičnu korporativnu argumentaciju "it is bad for business" i "As a business owner I can not have somebody who publicly represents my business posting hate speech online". Pritom, ovo "voting no is homophobic" je neverovatno antidemokratski - ako je neka tema stavljena na referendum, društvo mora oba odgovora da tretira kao jednako legiitimna. 

 

Edit: na prvom linku imate video intervju sa otpuštenom devojkom iz drugog slučaja. 

Edited by pacey defender
Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...